Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Rodriguez-Isaac v. US
as 23-1916
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ISAAC
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Crespo-Morales v. Caro-Delgado
as 23-1729
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN M. CRESPO-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
NICANOR CARO-DELGADO
Respondent:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ
Crespo-Morales v. Caro-Delgado
as 23-1638
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN M. CRESPO-MORALES
Respondent / Appellee:
NICANOR CARO-DELGADO
Respondent:
CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ
Cruz-Rodriguez v. US
as 23-1448
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABIMAEL CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant:
ASHBEL T. WALL, Individually and Officially, C.O. GEOFF, Individually and Officially, CAPTAIN DUFFY, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, Individually and Officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, Individually and Officially, JACK WARD, Individually and Officially and others
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, individually and officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, individually and officially, JACK WARD, individually and officially and others
Defendant:
C.O. DEPHILLIPS, individually and officially, C.O. GEOFF, individually and officially, ASHBEL T. WALL, individually and officially and others
Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. US
as 22-1887
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL L. RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Concepcion-Pesquera v. Rodriguez
as 22-1962
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE CONCEPCION-PESQUERA
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIQUEZ, Superintendent and MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Superintendent, MCI-Shirley
Diaz-Rodriguez v. US
as 22-1109
Petitioner:
FERNANDO DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
