Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Bautista Cayman Asset Company v. Centro Cardiovascular de Manati III, C.S.P., et al
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
BAUTISTA CAYMAN ASSET COMPANY
Defendant:
CENTRO CARDIOVASCULAR DE MANATI III, C.S.P., JOSE RAMON MARTINEZ-BARROSO, VIRGEN MILAGROS RIVERA-COLON and others
US v. Escalera-Martinez
as 24-1506
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
EDDIE ESCALERA-MARTINEZ
US v. Melendez-Martinez
as 24-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
LEMUEL MELENDEZ-MARTINEZ
Martinez-Diaz v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
PAOLA ORLANDA MARTINEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION and GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
US v. Lara-Martinez
as 24-1288
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALDRIN MANUEL LARA-MARTINEZ
US v. Ayala-Martinez
as 24-1179
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGELA AYALA-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Sealed Defendant 1, a/k/a La Vieja, a/k/a La Senora
US v. Kelly-Martinez
as 24-1079
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIGIDO KELLY-MARTINEZ
Duarte De Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1057
Petitioner:
KATHYA ROXANA DUARTE DE MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Burgos-Martinez
as 24-1005
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HERIBERTO BURGOS-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Spowell, a/k/a Spo, a/k/a La Cabra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
