Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Langara, et al v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 22-1452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RACHEL LANGARA and HANS LANGARA
Defendant / Appellee:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, and others
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court:
PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
