Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Briggs v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMEON J. BRIGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Director of RIDOC, LINDA AMADO, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Administrator of Classification Service and others
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 22-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY G. GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, Director, WALTER DUFFY, Captain, BILLIE-JO GALLAGHER, Grievance Coordinator and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Nickerson v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-1444
Defendant:
JAMES WEEDEN, Warden, CRANSTON, RI, C.O. OLIVER and others
Interested Party:
KENDALL JOHNSON and CODY-ALLEN ZAB
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, JENNIFER CLARKE, Medical Doctor, CORY K. CLOUD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LAMONTE NICKERSON
Petitioner:
JOSEPH W. SHEPARD, JOHN PACHECO, JR. and QUANDELL HUSBAND
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 21-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O ANTONELLI, JOSHUA MACOMBER, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
DeBritto v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 21-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEBRITTO
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARETTE, Correctional Officer, in his individual and official capacity, PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacity, ODEN, Lieutenant Correctional Officer, individually and official capacity and others
Neufville v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 21-1158
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY ACETO, in his individual and official capacity as Warden at Maximum Security Facility, BRUCE ODEN, in his individual and official capacity as Lieutenant, WALTER DUFFY, in his individual and official capacity as Captain at Maximum Security Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC G. NEUFVILLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
