Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Natale v. Bartstool Sports, Inc., et al
as 24-1877
Defendant:
BARSTOOL SPORTS, INC., CHARLES CASTRO, DCS INVESTIGATIONS and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA NATALE
US v. Baez-Nova
as 24-1261
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ROBINSON ALBERTO BAEZ-NOVA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 23-2078
Plaintiff:
JOE ROBINSON
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, In his official capacity
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity and others
Universitas Education, LLC v. Granderson
as 23-1675
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNIVERSITAS EDUCATION, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
LILLIAN GRANDERSON, as successor to Jack E. Robinson, III
Defendant:
JACK E. ROBINSON, III
3Rd Party Defendant:
LOEB & LOEB LLP
US v. Moller
as 23-1662
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER, a/k/a Michael Robinson
In Re: Oliver
as 23-1184
Petitioner:
THOMAS OLIVER
Respondent:
JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Robinson
as 23-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL M. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA J. ROBINSON
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
