Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
SEC v. Sanchez Diaz Monge We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1290
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: HAYDEE YOLANDA SANCHEZ DIAZ MONGE
Defendant: LUIS JIMENEZ CARRILLO, AMAR BAHADOORSINGH, JUSTIN ROGER WALL and others
Correa Carrillo v. Centro Medico Del Turabo Inc.
as 23-1273
Plaintiff / Appellee: LINNOSKA CORREA CARRILLO, in representation of her minor daughter JPC
Defendant / Appellee: CENTRO MEDICO DEL TURABO INC., d/b/a Hospital HIMA San Pablo Fajardo
Defendant: GRUPO HIMA SAN PABLO, INC. and LUIS EDUARDO PARDO-TORO
Correa Carrillo v. Grupo Hima San Pablo (Fajardo), Inc., et al
as 23-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINNOSKA CORREA CARRILLO, in representation of her minor daughter JPC
Defendant / Appellee: GRUPO HIMA SAN PABLO, INC. and CENTRO MEDICO DEL TURABO INC., d/b/a Hospital HIMA San Pablo Fajardo
Defendant: LUIS EDUARDO PARDO-TORO
US v. Carrillo-Ramirez
as 22-1771
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: HENRY CARRILLO-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Henry, a/k/a Compadre, a/k/a El Minero, a/k/a Barriga, a/k/a Santamarta, a/k/a El Capo, a/k/a Jose Vergel, a/k/a Edwin Jose Vergel-Ramirez
US v. Carrillo-Ramirez
as 22-1748
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: HENRY CARRILLO-RAMIREZ, a/k/a Henry, a/k/a Compadre, a/k/a El Minero, a/k/a Barriga, a/k/a Santamarta, a/k/a El Capo, a/k/a Jose Vergel, a/k/a Edwin Jose Vergel-Ramirez
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2051
Defendant: LINDA ALBOHN, MPCH Grievance and Appeal Coordinator in her official and individual capacities, GUIDO GUEVARA, MPCH Registered Nurse for MCI-Cedar Junction in his official and individual capacities, JOHN MARSHALL, former Superintendent, MCI-Cedar Junction in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANN EVANS, MPCH Licensed Nurse for MCI-Cedar Junction in her official and individual capacities, VANESSA RATTIGAN, MPCH Health Services Administration for MCI-Cedar Junction in her official and individual capacities, CAROL HIGGINS O'BRIEN, Commissioner of Department of Corrections in her official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHE BLAKE SOSA
Yanes, et al v. Martin, et al
as 20-1762
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CENTRAL FALLS DETENTION FACILITY, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Petitioner: OSCAR YANES, WENDELL RAFAEL BAEZ LOPEZ, ELMER ALFREDO AREVALO CARRILLO and others
Cruz Millan, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance, et al
as 20-1499
Plaintiff: EFRAIN BURGOS LOPEZ, JONATHAN ZHENG, A.S.C., minor represented by Luis Carrion-Lopez and others
Interested Party: MANUEL BATISTA-DE LA ROSA and SHIRLEY A. TEJADA
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCES T. SERRA MORALES, O.M.S., minor 3 represented by Orlando Morales and Quetcy Soler, G.C.L., minor 2 represented by Manuel Morales and Yadira Leon and others
Defendant: MULTINATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HF ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, PSC, G2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Doral Bank
Fore River Res Against Com Sta, et al v. FERC
as 20-1458
Interested Party: EVERSOURCE ENERGY, STOP THE ALGONQUIN PIPELINE EXPANSION, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Petitioner: REBECCA HAUGH, District One Town Councilor, QUINCY, MA, FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS) and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
US v. Arce Carillo
as 19-2269
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Claimant: JONATHAN ORLANDO ARCE CARRILLO
Defendant: $369,361.00 US CURRENCY, 2006 YAMAHA, YFZ350 Estimated Value $2,847.00 in U.S. Currency, 2009 KTM MODEL, 525XC Estimated Value $2,765.00 in U.S. Currency and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?