Cases 1 - 8 of 8
US v. Ortiz-Figueroa
as 21-1972
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS ORTIZ-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Geovanni
Pagan-Porrata, et al v. Municipio de Guaynabo, et al
as 19-2178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CUMBAS-APONTE, CYNTHIA PAGAN-PRORRATA, ROBERTO SANTOS-TORRES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTOR FRANCO, in his official capacity as Police Commissioner of Guaynabo Municipal Police Department and GUAYNABO, PR
Ortiz-Espinosa, et al v. BBVA Sec. of Puerto Rico, Inc., et al
as 16-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS ORTIZ-ESPINOSA, MARITZA SOTO-GARCIA and LUIS ORTIZ-ESPINOSA, AS TRUSTEE OF CENTRO DERMATOLOGICO SAN PABLO PSC RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BBVA SECURITIES OF PUERTO RICO, INC. and RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-ABELLA
Ortiz-Espinosa, et al v. BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, et al
as 12-2514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS ORTIZ-ESPINOSA, MARITZA SOTO-GARCIA and CENTRO DERMATOLOGICO SAN PABLO PSC RETIREMENT PLAN, Luis Ortiz Espinosa as trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
BBVA SECURITIES OF PUERTO RICO, INC. and RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-ABELLA
Ortiz-Espinosa et al v. BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01608
Plaintiff:
Luis Ortiz-Espinosa , Maritza Soto-Garcia , Conjugal Partnership Ortiz-Soto and others
Defendant:
BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. and Rafael Rodriguez-Abella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PPV Connection, Inc. et al v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2009cv01447
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc., Conjugal Partnership Nunez-Doe 2 and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Doe 3
Defendant:
Carlos Hernandez, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Hernandez-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Vazquez-Rivera et al
as 3:2008cv02223
Plaintiff:
Nora Cristina Vazquez-Rivera and Hector Luis Ortiz-Vazquez
Defendant:
Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc., Maryrose G Concepcion-Giron, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
