Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boggs v. Human Society et al
as 1:2024cv10279
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Human Society and City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grayson v. Giorgi et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Brent E. Grayson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Giorgi, A.C.I Department of Corrections, The Rhode Island State Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grayson v. A.C.I Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Brent E. Grayson
Defendant:
Craig UNK, The City of Cranston, A.C.I Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. Salem Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv11531
Defendant:
Mr. Brian Butler, Salem Police Department and City of Salem
Plaintiff:
Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIETZKE v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
BILL LIETZKE
Defendant:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIETZKE v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
BILL LIETZKE
Defendant:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aby v. City of Cambridge et al
as 1:2014cv13256
Plaintiff:
Laetitia Aby
Defendant:
City of Cambridge, Cambridge Police Department, David Serino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skroback v. Kervick III et al
as 3:2009cv30063
Plaintiff:
Francis Skroback
Defendant:
James F. Kervick, III and City of Springfield
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Breeden v. City of Brookline et al
as 1:2007cv11555
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Breeden
Defendant:
City of Brookline, Brookline Police Department, Daniel C. O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jones v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2007cv40009
Plaintiff:
Frank Q. Jones
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Michael V. O'Brien, Amy Vogel Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
