Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Huxford v. Ameridose LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12662
Plaintiff:
Scott Huxford
Defendant:
Ameridose LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Barry Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12315
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Hester , Jerry Ray Hester , Michael Prince Hester and others
Defendant:
Ameridose LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt et al v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2013cv10941
Plaintiff:
Dana Scott Pruitt and Lesa Shadowhawk
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Richter et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2012cv11029
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Richter and Scott D Richter
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03508
Plaintiff:
Lisa Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Klatt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03467
Plaintiff:
Scott Klatt, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Scott et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03492
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott and Lori Scott
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torrey et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03077
Plaintiff:
Cindie Torrey and Scott Torrey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03132
Plaintiff:
Connie Scott and Rufus Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Trepod v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Trepod
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
