Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
MONTGOMERY v. SCOTTS COMPANY LLC
as 1:2009cv00490
Plaintiff: VIOLET MONTGOMERY
Defendant: SCOTTS COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
SCOTT v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02783
Plaintiff: LOUELLA SCOTT
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRAMER et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02597
Plaintiff: TAMMY CRAMER and SCOTT CRAMER
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Morgan et al v. GE Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11553
Plaintiff: Scott Morgan and Nicole Morgan
Defendant: General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Inc., GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bennett et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 1:2008cv10678
Plaintiff: Marilyn Bennett, Scott Bennett and Chad Bennett
Defendant: Pfizer Inc, Parke-Davis, Warner-Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beal v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02370
Plaintiff: Scott Beal
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
HOLLANDER et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02334
Plaintiff: SCOTT R. HOLLANDER and CAROL HOLLANDER
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02185
Plaintiff: Patty Lou Scott
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02230
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carl E. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02237
Plaintiff: Robert Scott Jones
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?