Cases 1 - 10 of 49
RDC Liquidating Trust v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al
as 1:2024cv11320
Plaintiff:
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Value Drug Company v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv11312
Plaintiff:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10565
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv11255
Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Endo International PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FWK Holdings LLC et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv11057
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Endo International PLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FWK Holdings LLC et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv11056
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Endo International PLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor:
Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner:
Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re:
Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2017cv11466
Plaintiff:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv10238
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Sandoz Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
