Cases 91 - 100 of 665
Thyme v. The Republican Party et al
as 1:2021cv11023
Plaintiff:
Arthur Thyme
Defendant:
The Democratic Party and The Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dominic v. Goldman et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Concord Hospital, Inc., Emelia A.S. Galdiera, Provident Bankcorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Dominic
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Series 17-04-631, LLC v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10553
Defendant:
Mckinsey & Company, Inc., United States and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
Series 17-04-631, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Robinson v. Weisenberg et al
as 1:2021cv10397
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Merrill and McGeary, Attorneys At Law, Robert Weisenberg and Suffolk County Constable's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaul, MD v. Boston Partners, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv10326
Defendant:
North Jersey Media Group Inc, Boston Partners, Inc, Robert Heary,MD and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INTECO TUBING LLC v. Iwuanyanwu et al
as 1:2020cv12168
Plaintiff:
INTECO TUBING LLC
Defendant:
Paul M. Iwuanyanwu, Larry Brown, Jr. and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Glassie v. Doucette et al
as 1:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Thomas Glassie, Paul Doucette and John Taft
Plaintiff:
Georgia Glassie
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Saade v. Efron et al
as 1:2021cv10069
Defendant:
BEE Investments, LLC, Bruce Efron and Does
Plaintiff:
Jack Saade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 1:2020cv12130
Plaintiff:
Allan M Leavitt
Defendant:
Lamontagne, Spaulding and Hayes, LLP, Stuart Parker, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Town of Millis, MA v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv12156
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan plc, Allergan Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Millis, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
