Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Lu v. Canton Corp., et al
as 15-1741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant - Appellee:
CANTON CORP., FAIRFIELD REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT CO., ALBERT OGISTE and others
Fernandes v. Briotte et al
as 1:2015cv12580
Plaintiff:
William M. Fernandes
Defendant:
Andre Briotte, Jr., Anthony D. Williams, Briane M. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Universitas Education, LLC v. Robinson
as 1:2015cv11848
Plaintiff:
Universitas Education, LLC
Defendant:
Jack E. Robinson, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lu v. Downie et al
as 1:2015cv11558
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Lyndia Downie, Rosemary Cashman, Fred Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. The Canton Corp et al
as 1:2015cv10088
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
The Canton Corp, Fairfield Real Estate Management Co., Albert Ogiste and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caro-Bonet et al v. Lotus Management LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01925
Plaintiff:
Armando Caro-Bonet and Iris Santos-Diaz
Defendant:
Lotus Management LLC, Jorge E. Perez, Livepad International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Re v. State Bar of New Mexico et al
as 1:2014cv00167
Defendant:
Albuquerque, NM, City of, Bernalillo County, Kari E. Brandenburg and others
Plaintiff:
Amon Re
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
