Cases 71 - 80 of 136
Shelton v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv11402
Petitioner:
Terry Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shelton v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv10915
Petitioner:
Terry C. Shelton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndiaye v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv40047
Plaintiff:
Papa Ndiaye
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ndiaye v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv10332
Petitioner:
Papa Ndiaye
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv01077
Petitioner:
Pablo Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Sabol et al
as 4:2009cv40165
Petitioner:
Armondo Johntel Cole
Respondent:
Carolyn N. Sabol and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv11591
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCarroll v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv11018
Petitioner:
Jordan McCarroll
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese-Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv40059
Petitioner:
Christopher C. Reese-Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America and Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Arrango-Herrera v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv01147
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Arrango-Herrera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
