Cases 111 - 120 of 2,089
Torres v. Sgt. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv10053
Plaintiff:
Rafael Torres
Defendant:
Sgt. Babcock, C.O. Schofield, C.O. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Negron v. Mici et al
as 1:2022cv12030
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici, Nelson Alves and Jodi Hockert-Lotz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bah v. Correctional Officer Davis
as 1:2023cv10021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bah
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Brighton Police Chief et al
as 1:2023cv10020
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Brighton Police Chief, Brighton Police Officers 1-25 John Does, Brighton Supervising Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrade v. Divris
as 1:2022cv12237
Petitioner:
Manuel Andrade
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Burdzy et al
as 1:2022cv12207
Plaintiff:
Elijah J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mark Burdzy, Kevin S Clonan, J Peppoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchette v. Cambell
as 1:2022cv12210
Plaintiff:
Robert Blanchette
Defendant:
John Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. SSA, Salem, MA
as 1:2022cv12069
Plaintiff:
Juan Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
SSA, Salem, MA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Hart et al
as 1:2022cv11846
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V.
Defendant:
Stephen P Hart and Rev. Janice Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verrier v. Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11855
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Verrier
Defendant:
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
