Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Su v. Next Step Healthcare LLC, et al
as 1:2023cv13051
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Next Step Healthcare LLC, d/b/a Next Step Healthcare, 27 George Street Operator LLC d/b/a Attleboro Healthcare, 1650 Washington Street Operator LLC d/b/a Chetwynde Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Guevara-Salgado v. Hayes-Meninno, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv12294
Plaintiff:
Mario H Guevara-Salgado
Defendant:
Hayes-Meninno, LLC, Wendy Meninno Hayes and Roland John Hayes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Daly et al V. City of Newton
as 1:2012cv11101
Plaintiff:
John M. Daly , Michael Abbruzzese , Russell Adam and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Costello et al v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01366
Plaintiff:
James D. Costello , Liza Logan , Matthew Picco and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reeves v. Northern Property Management, Inc.
as 3:2010cv30111
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Reeves
Defendant:
Northern Property Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHEN et al v. SUPER GREAT WALL BUFFET INC et al
as 2:2009cv00397
Plaintiff:
YAN Q CHEN , DAN G LIN , WEI H WANG and others
Defendant:
SUPER GREAT WALL BUFFET INC , REN QI CHEN , SIOW WOOI CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calvao, et al v. Framingham, Town of
as 09-1648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUARTE CALVAO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN ABT, ANGELA AURELIO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM, MA
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae:
CITY SOLICITORS, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC., TOWN COUNSEL ASSOCIATION and others
Cook et al v. City of Concord
as 1:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian H. Cook, Michael W. Kulak, Steven L. Martel and others
Defendant:
Concord, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
