Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Sidman
as 24-1385
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Penobscot Bay and River Pilot Ass'n. v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Cross Plaintiff: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Ass'n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihooods, et al v. Town of Bar Harbor, et al
as 24-1317
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LOCAL LIVELIHOODS, BH PIERS, LLC, GOLDEN ANCHOR, LC, d/b/a Harborside Hotel and others
Interested Party: PENOBSCOT BAY AND RIVER PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant: BAR HARBOR, ME, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Maine
Cross Defendant: CHARLES SIDMAN
Narrigan v. Goldberg
as 1:2024cv10107
Plaintiff: Thomas R. Narrigan
Defendant: Deborah B. Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullane v. Gants et al
as 1:2019cv10407
Plaintiff: Jonathan Mullane
Defendant: Michele B Hogan, Maura Healey and Ralph D. Gants
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2017cv01567
Plaintiff: Ambac Assurance Corporation
Defendant: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Ricardo Rossello Nevares, Raul Maldonado-Gautier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2017cv01568
Plaintiff: Ambac Assurance Corporation
Defendant: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Ricardo Rossello Nevares, Raul Maldonado-Gautier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Servidores Publicos Unidos de Puerto Rico et al v. Financial Oversight and Management Board et al
as 3:2017cv01483
Plaintiff: Servidores Publicos Unidos de Puerto Rico , Sandra Pacheco-Santiago , Carlos Reyes-Castro and others
Defendant: Financial Oversight and Management Board , Ricardo Rossello Nevares , Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altair Global Credit, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2433
Movant - Appellant: PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND, INC., PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO TARGET MATURITY FUND, INC., ALTAIR GLOBAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND (A), LLC and others
Movant - Appellee: CLAREN ROAD CREDIT MASTER FUND, LTD., CLAREN ROAD CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LTD., OCHER ROSE, L.L.C. and others
Respondent - Appellee: ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as the Governor of Puerto Rico, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, In his official capacity as the Secretary of Treasury of Puerto Rico, LUIS F. CRUZ-BATISTA, in his official capacity as the Director of the Commonwealth's Office of Management and Budget and others
Movant: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Altair Global Credit, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2435
Movant - Appellee: PUERTO RICO FIXED INCOME FUND V, INC., PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND, INC., PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO TARGET MATURITY FUND, INC. and others
Respondent - Appellee: ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as the Governor of Puerto Rico, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Treasury of Puerto Rico, LUIS F. CRUZ-BATISTA, in his official capacity as the Director of the Commonwealth's Office of Management and Budget and others
Movant - Appellant: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?