Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Medina-Ramos et al v. Moschetta-Carolyn et al
as 3:2010cv01911
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina-Ramos , Aida Tirado-Saltares and Conjugal Partnership Medina-Tirado
Defendant:
Ron Moschetta-Carolyn, Rose Marie Depetrillo-Marstelo and Conjugal Partnership Moschetta-Depetrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez & Medina Corp. v. Piedmont Aviation, et al
as 10-1702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOPEZ & MEDINA CORP., d/b/a Emmanuel Travel & Tours
Defendant:
MARSH USA, INC., as agent for certain subscribing and/or participating insurance underwriters for Policies No. AW823101, S1HL-200A, HL3391396-02, PXLA37000032-01, MMO2326AV501 and AAV01.440 issued to Patriot Air LLC, d/b/a Marsh Aviation
Defendant - Appellee:
PIEDMONT AVIATION SERVICES, INC., for the benefit, d/b/a Pace Airlines, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON and others
Medina & Medina, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation
as 3:2009cv01098
Plaintiff:
Medina & Medina, Inc.
Defendant:
Hormel Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Grow America Fund, Inc. v. Padilla-Medina et al
as 3:2008cv02358
Plaintiff:
Grow America Fund, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Luis Padilla-Medina, Sylvia Annette Martinez-Soto and Conjugal Partnership Padilla-Martinez
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pramco CV9, LLC v. Torres-Santiago et al
as 3:2008cv01958
Plaintiff:
Pramco CV9, LLC
Defendant:
Edwin Torres-Santiago, Maria Julia Medina-Figueroa and Conjugal Partnership Torres-Medina
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pramco CV9, LLC v. Negron-Medina et al
as 3:2008cv01922
Plaintiff:
Pramco CV9, LLC
Defendant:
Rafael Negron-Medina, Mayra Cabello-Davila and Conjugal Partnership Negron-Cabello
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LaRosa Landscaping, Inc. v. Mark's Akron Medina Truck Sales, Inc.
as 1:2008cv10070
Plaintiff:
LaRosa Landscaping, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark's Akron Medina Truck Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
