Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sterling Equipment Inc. v. Mount Construction Company Inc.
as 1:2023cv12387
Plaintiff:
Sterling Equipment Inc.
Defendant:
Mount Construction Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Onego Shipping & Chartering, b.v. v. Steel Barge CHRISTY 400 et al
as 1:2019cv10706
Defendant:
Moravia Steel, A.S., Steel Barge CHRISTY 400, Jay Cashman, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Onego Shipping & Chartering, b.v.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sterling Equipment, Inc. v. Agate Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2012cv10130
Plaintiff:
Sterling Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Agate Construction Co., Inc.
Garnishee:
Conocophillips Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC v. Dredge Vessel 'ATCHAFALAYA" Her engines, rigging, equipment and appurtenances, etc. In Rem
as 1:2010cv12220
Plaintiff:
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC
Defendant:
Dredge Vessel 'ATCHAFALAYA" Her engines, rigging, equipment and appurtenances, etc. In Rem , Sterling Equipment, Inc. , Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting Co., LLC , Sterling Equipment, Inc. , Cashman Dredging International, LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
DERECKTOR SHIPYARDS CONN., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sterling Equipment, Inc. v. Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel TAURACAVOR
as 1:2008cv11523
Plaintiff:
Sterling Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel TAURACAVOR
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sterling Equipment, Inc. v. North American Demolition Company
as 1:2007cv11942
Plaintiff:
Sterling Equipment, Inc.,
Defendant:
North American Demolition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Sterling Equipment, Inc. V. Sea Tech Marine International,Inc
as 1:2007cv11083
Plaintiff:
Sterling Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
Sea Tech Marine International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
