Cases 11 - 20 of 48
LIBBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
KRISTAL B LIBBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. B. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burgo v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv11920
Plaintiff:
Antonio B Burgo
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Menapace v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv14045
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Menapace
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gage v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv40094
Plaintiff:
Allen B. Gage, III
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marks v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
William B. Marks
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Desmond v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv10258
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Desmond
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nerich v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dann B. Nerich
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wnuk v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv11854
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Wnuk
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rieth v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jennifer B. Rieth
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
