Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Silva-Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Denisse I Silva-Gonzalez and Denisse I. Silva-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Silva v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10559
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Silva
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Silva v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01793
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Da Silva v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv11294
Plaintiff:
Michael Da Silva
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Melissa S. v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00148
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Melissa Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michele S. v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Michele Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Silva v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Amenda Silva
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Silva v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Andrea Silva
Notice Only:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Silva v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv11798
Plaintiff:
Ella Silva
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Silva v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv10700
Plaintiff:
Michael Silva
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
