Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv10319
Plaintiff:
Adam Forrest Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv10319
Plaintiff:
Adam Forrest Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10633
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Mataya Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WITHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2019cv00258
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WITHAM
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramos-Oquendo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01305
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ramos Oquendo
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Phillips v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Phillips
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walsh v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Bruce Phillip Walsh
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pelletier c. Colvin
as 3:2014cv30105
Plaintiff:
Phillip H Pelletier
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bryson v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Bryson, II
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Phillips v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv30259
Plaintiff:
Shawn Paul Phillips, Sr
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
