Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Estep v. Baker, et al
as 19-1211
Defendant / Appellee:
TINA HURLEY, INA HOWARD-HOGAN, PAUL MICHAEL TRESELER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS R. ESTEP
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
In re: Paul J. Bennett
as 1:2018adr00007
Other:
American Bar Association, US Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk and US Court of Appeals-First Circuit, Clerk
Respondent:
Paul J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reilly v. J. Jill, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12098
Plaintiff:
Sean Reilly
Defendant:
J. Jill, Inc. , Paula Bennett , David Biese and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chapman v. J. Jill, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12078
Defendant:
J. Jill, Inc. , Paula Bennett , David Biese and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Branen v. J. Jill, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11980
Plaintiff:
Sharon Branen
Defendant:
J. Jill, Inc. , Paula Bennett , David Biese and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
US v. Parrilla
as 15-2403
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNDON J. PARRILLA
Interested Party:
WARREN ANGUS, STEPHEN BABIN, ARTHUR BALDWIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
