Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
US v. Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1953
Defendant / Appellant: DIOVANNI CARTER
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Rourke v. Carter, et al
as 19-2256
Defendant / Appellee: JIMMY CARTER, President and US AIR FORCE
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES ROURKE
US v. Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1644
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON P. CARTER
Carter v. US
as 19-1473
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT KELLY CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Harihar v. Howard et al
as 1:2018cv11134
Plaintiff: Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant: Jeffrey R. Howard, Juan R. Toruella, William J. Kayatta and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
In re Trerotola
as 1:2018mc91110
Movant: Gregory Trerotola
Defendant: CIOX Health, LLC
Plaintiff: Marissa Carter , Evelyn Grys , Bruce Currier and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
US v. Carter
as 17-1738
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: WAYNE CARTER
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-8009
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Defendant - Petitioner: DIAL CORP.
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party: RHONDA D. JONES
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Respondent: MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Petitioner: DIAL CORP.
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party: RHONDA D. JONES
US v. Flores-Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2226
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ASHLEY FLORES-CARTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?