Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Beaulieu v. NH Governor, et al.
as 1:2016cv00471
Defendant:
Kathleen Anderson, John Aulis, James Azzara and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Beaulieu
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Hulka et al
as 1:2017cv11939
Plaintiff:
Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, MD PhD
Defendant:
Carol Hulka, M.D., Rachel Nardin, M.D., James Paikos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Larison-Santos v. Cook et al
as 1:2016cv12029
Plaintiff:
Gwen Larison-Santos
Defendant:
Brian R. Cook and Denise Boisvert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: Cook
as 16-8028
Respondent:
ALLAN KENNEDY COOK
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Padmanabhan v. Healey, et al
as 16-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN, MD PhD (Dr. Bharani)
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, STEVEN L HOFFMAN, CHRIS CECCHINI and others
US v. Zimny
as 15-2144
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK J. ZIMNY
Interested Party:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE SOMMER COOKE, KEVIN W. CLANCY and others
Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Healey et al
as 1:2015cv13297
Plaintiff:
Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, MD PhD
Defendant:
Maura Healey , Steven Hoffman , Chris Cecchini and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
In Re: Padmanabhan
as 15-1638
Petitioner:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANBHAN
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD, WILLIAM KASSLER and others
Cook v. Telexelectric, LLLP et al
as 4:2014cv40154
Plaintiff:
Todd Cook
Defendant:
TelexElectric, LLLP, TELEX MOBILE HOLDINGS, INC., James M. Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
