Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv12022
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts , State of California , District of Columbia and others
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
McGuire v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1106
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK MCGUIRE
Plaintiff - Appellee: RYAN UEHLING, ex rel, JOHN DOE, ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: WENDY JOHNSON, ex rel, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant: HOWARD APPEL, JAMES SLATTERY, MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
United States of America et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc91372
Plaintiff: United States of America, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc. and CIGNA Corporation
US, et al v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES, ex rel. ALEX BOOKER and EDMUND HEBRON, ALEX BOOKER, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and EDMUND HEBRON, ex rel. UNITED STATES, STATES OF CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA and WI, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Nargol, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1442
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Defendant - Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc91068
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, District of Columbia and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant: Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
D'Agostino v. EV3, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY D'AGOSTINO
Plaintiff: STATE OF CA, STATE OF CT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: EV3, INC. and MICROTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN CUBELIC, VITAS J. SIPELIS, JOHN HARDIN and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES
Winkelman, et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1991
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MYRON WINKELMAN, Ex Rel, STEPHANI LEFLORE, Ex Rel and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CAREMARK RX, INC., CAREMARK PCS LLC and others
Garcia, et al v. Novartis, AG, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1470
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, ex rel. Allison Kelly, Frank Garcia, Stephen Fauci, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLISON KELLY, ex rel United States and FRANK GARCIA, ex rel United States
Defendant: NOVARTIS AG and ROCHE GROUP
Defendant - Appellee: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ROCHE HOLDINGS INC, GENENTECH, INC. and others
US, ex rel. D'Agostino v. ev3, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2145
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY D'AGOSTINO
Plaintiff: STATE OF CA, STATE OF CT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff - Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee: EV3, INC., JOHN HARDIN, MICROTHERAPEUTICS, INC. and others
Defendant: JOHN CUBELIC and VITAS J. SIPELIS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?