Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
US v. Astacio-Espino, et al
as 17-1729
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN BERNARD ASTACIO-ESPINO, a/k/a Bernard, a/k/a Bernal, LUIS D. RIVERA-CARRASQUILLO, a/k/a Danny KX, a/k/a Danny Vorki and RAMON LANZA-VAZQUEZ, a/k/a Ramoncito
US v. Astacio-Espino, et al
as 17-1317
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN BERNARD ASTACIO-ESPINO, a/k/a Bernard, a/k/a Bernal, LUIS D. RIVERA-CARRASQUILLO, a/k/a Danny KX, a/k/a Danny Vorki and RAMON LANZA-VAZQUEZ, a/k/a Ramoncito
CrossFit, Inc. v. Mustapha
as 16-1987
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROSSFIT, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
DONNY MUSTAPHA, individually and, d/b/a Chelmsford Sports Club, RONNIE BRIERE, individually and, d/b/a CrossFit Objective, CHRIS COOPER, individually and as Regional Media Director for CrossFit, Inc., d/b/a CrossFit Catalyst and others
Pay-Per-View Sports, Inc. v. Salon Deportivo de Robert et al
as 3:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
Pay-Per-View Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Salon Deportivo de Robert, El Parian de Esther, Tonitas Cafe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.