Cases 11 - 20 of 63
In Re: Foistner
as 22-8013
Respondent:
JOSEPH FOISTNER
Interested Party:
NH DISTRICT COURT NEW HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COURT
Higgins v. United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv11512
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, City of Melrose and Stephan's Auto Body Towing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
In Re: Carrasco-Castillo
as 21-8024
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Respondent:
ALEJANDRO GABRIEL CARRASCO-CASTILLO
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School, et al
as 21-1435
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Justice of the United States District Court as Chair of the RWU Law Board of Directors, OLIVIA MILONAS, MICHAEL YELONSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH, and similarly situated persons
In Re: Castor
as 21-8012
Respondent:
NATHALIE ROSE CASTOR
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
In Re: Lajara Radinson
as 21-8009
Respondent:
DIOMEDES MIGUEL LAJARA RADINSON
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
In re: Bourdon
as 20-2192
Respondent:
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Federal Judge, US District Court, in his individual and official capacity and COREY RIENDEAU, Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Petitioner:
RONALD BOURDON
Quinones-Mercado v. US, et al
as 20-2182
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO, FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN, US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERMAN QUINONES-MERCADO, JR. and GERMAN JR. QUINONES-MERCADO
Ardaneh v. US Government, et al
as 20-1887
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, HEATHER STROUD, US JEWISH MAFIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Plourde v. State of Maine, et al
as 20-1611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN PLOURDE
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. HARTLEY, Attorney at Law, STATE OF MAINE, CHARLES F. BUDD, JR., Newport District Court Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
