Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 20-1952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O ANTONELLI, JOSHUA MACOMBER, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 20-1921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O SANTA GATA, C/O ANTONELLI and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Plourde v. US, et al
as 20-1777
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, MAINE AMERICAN RED CROSS, JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Director of National Intelligence (Retired) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN PLOURDE
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIAL JACK, Knox county Sheriff's Department Deputy, BETH ASHCROFT, Office of Program Evaulation and Government Accountability, UNKOWN KNOX COUNTY, SHERIFF'S OFFICE SUV DRIVER and others
Plaintiff:
OFFICER CAVANAUGH FREEPORT MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (Rank Unknown)
Fagre v. Parks
as 20-1343
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SCOTT W. IRELAND, CHIEF MARK BROWN, MARK BROWN, Chief of Police and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER JEFFREY PARKS and JEFFREY PARKS, Trooper
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA FARGE, as personal representative of the Estate of Ambroshia E. Farge and JESSICA FAGRE, as personal representative of the Estate of Ambroshia E. Fagre
Stow v. McGrath, et al
as 20-1109
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD HARDY, Sergeant, NH State Prison, JOHN PERKINS, ROBERT MCGRATH, Prison Unit Manager, NH State Prison and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM L. WRENN, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. KENCH, Director of Security and Training, NH Department of Corrections and LYNMARIE C. CUSACK, Assistant Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Thompson v. Hassett, et al
as 19-1978
Defendant:
RI STATE POLICE, LIEUTENANT SCHRAM, CORPORAL YANYAR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GARRETT HASSETT, in his individual capacity and JEFFREY KONIECZNY, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MONDREZ THOMPSON
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. US Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Lieutenant General Todd T Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321
Winfield, et al v. Keefe, et al
as 19-1304
Defendant:
WENDY ADAMS, DERRECK DERANIAN, Officer, SOBAHN NAMVAR, Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK KEEFE, CHAD COOPER, PATRICK KEEFE, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE Y. WINFIELD and ROBERT WINFIELD
Interested Party:
NIKHIL THAKUR
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 19-1241
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN CADY, ELIOT POLICE DEPARTMENT, SA STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR. and others
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, US BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Interested Party:
TRAVIS WEBBER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Holloman v. Maine, et al
as 19-1037
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacities, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, JEFFREY P. DAIGNEAULT, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON GILL, Sergeant Corrections Officer, Souza Baranowki Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and FRANK MAINE, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAJUAN HOLLOMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
