Cases 11 - 17 of 17
US v. Svirskiy
as 19-1595
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GENE SVIRSKIY
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Stepanets
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-1471
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALLA V. STEPANETS
US v. Cadden
as 17-1712
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, owner of the radio station WBUR (WBUR)
US v. Cadden
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-1694
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, owner of the radio station WBUR (WBUR)
US v. Tsarnaev
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-6001
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV, a/k/a Jahar Tsarni
Interested Party:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, d/b/a WBUR-FM and others
USA v. Tsarnaev
as 1:2013cr10200
Defendant:
Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev and Jahar Tsarni
Interested Party:
Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., CBS News and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Seale et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2009mc10198
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Seale and Jamie Adams Seale
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Glaxosmithkline, PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd. and others
Movant:
Trustees of Boston University, Allen A. Mitchell, M.D., Carol Louik, Sc.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.