Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,637
Chanchavac Garcia, et al v. Garland
as 24-1296
Petitioner: VENTURA CHANCHAVAC GARCIA and ROSA CLEOTILDE TEMA LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Morgan v. Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner: AKEISH JOHNIOY MORGAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sanches Alves, et al v. Garland
as 24-1258
Petitioner: MATEUS SANCHES ALVES, FRANCIELE DOS REIS OLIMPIO ALVES and E.M.S.R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alvarez Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1260
Petitioner: JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Goncalves Leao v. Garland
as 24-1239
Petitioner: LEONARDO GONCALVES LEAO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mondzali Bopaka v. Garland
as 24-1201
Petitioner: CHRISMA FELIN MONDZALI BOPAKA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Matul-Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1196
Petitioner: RIGOBERTO MATUL-LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Vargas Panchi, et al v. Garland
as 24-1172
Petitioner: MILTON GEOVANNY VARGAS PANCHI, AIDI VERONICA CONDOR LASSO, M. A. V.C. and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?