Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 285
Santiago-Martinez, et al v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.
as 21-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant: YANIRA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, in representation of minor J.R.S. and RAYMOND RAMIREZ-CARABALLO, in representation of minor J.R.S.
Defendant / Appellee: FUNDACION DAMAS, INC., d/b/a Hospital Damas, Inc., JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership
Defendant: HOSPITAL DAMAS, INC., or, alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Damas, JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, in representation of his Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of her Conjugal Partnership
US v. Santiago-Lugo
as 21-1654
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Interested Party: PR DEPT OF TREASURY, ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES and others
Motorists Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. Espaillat, et al
as 21-1636
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOTORISTS COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: ROGER HARTWELL, LYNNWAY AUTO AUCTION, INC., SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant / Appellant: RUBEN D. ESPAILLAT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ruben Dario Espaillat, TAMMY L. BERIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elliott Rowlands, Jr., GIOVANNI SANTIAGO and others
Interested Party: ABDUL NASSER and EDGAR MEZA
Arana-Santiago v. Tapia-Maldonado, et al
as 21-1625
Plaintiff / Appellant: DR. LUIS S. ARANA-SANTIAGO
Debtor / Appellee: LUIS TAPIA-MALDONADO
Defendant / Appellee: JOSE HEREDIA-RODRIGUEZ, VIVIAN VELEZ-VERA and MARISOL DIAZ-OCASIO
Defendant: MARIA RODRIGUEZ-SIERRA
Motorists Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. Hartwell, et al
as 21-1603
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOTORISTS COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: ROGER HARTWELL, LYNNWAY AUTO AUCTION and LYNNWAY AUTO AUCTION, INC.
Defendant: SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY, RUBEN D. ESPAILLAT, as personal representative of the Estate of Ruben Dario Espaillat, TAMMY L. BERIO, as personal representative of the Estate of Elliott Rowlands, Jr. and others
Vapotherm, Inc. v. Santiago
as 21-1567
Plaintiff / Appellant: VAPOTHERM, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: CLAYTON SANTIAGO
Defendant: VERO BIOTECH, LLC
V. Suarez & Co., Inc. v. Camioneros Unidos de Puerto Rico, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01271
Defendant: Pablo Perez-Santiago, Camioneros Unidos de PR, LLC, Carlos J. Schettini and others
Plaintiff: V. Suarez & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation
Garcia-Perales, et al v. Mendez
as 21-1337
Plaintiff / Appellee: HECTOR VELEZ-CARRASQUILLO, RAFAEL LEYVA-ROMERO, YAITZA RIVAS-SANTIAGO and others
Defendant / Appellant: CARLOS JOHNNY MENDEZ
Defendant: WILFREDO RAMOS-GARCIA, PABLO SASTRE-FERNANDEZ, THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ and others
Washington-Del Valle, et al v. Rivera-Schatz, et al
as 21-1231
Defendant: JOSE LUIS DALMAU-SANTIAGO, in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-MONTANEZ, CARLOS JOHNNY MENDEZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUIS A. RIVERA-GONZALEZ, ARIADNA LOPEZ, IVONNE BORRERO-CASADO and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, LISANDRA MALDONADO-ALVARADO, WILFREDO RAMOS-GARCIA and others
Interested Party: PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Garcia-Perales, et al v. Rivera-Schatz, et al
as 21-1235
Plaintiff / Appellee: HECTOR VELEZ-CARRASQUILLO, RAFAEL LEYVA-ROMERO, YAITZA RIVAS-SANTIAGO and others
Defendant: CARLOS JOHNNY MENDEZ, JOSE LUIS DALMAU-SANTIAGO, in his Official Capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico and JOSE FIGUEROA-TORRES
Defendant / Appellant: GABRIEL HERNANDEZ, WILFREDO RAMOS, THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?