Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Rissman, Hendricks & Oliverio LLP v. MIV Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11747
Plaintiff: Rissman, Hendricks & Oliverio LLP
Defendant: MIV Therapeutics, Inc., Biosync Scientific PVT Ltd., Purple Medical Solutions PVT Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Enargy Power (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd et al V. Xiaolong Wang et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv11348
Plaintiff: Enargy Power (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd , Enargy Corporation , Zoomkoh Management LLC and others
Defendant: Xiaolong Wang and Cecei Chen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Chen v. Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1294
Petitioner: HONG CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Chen v. Holder We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2055
Petitioner: MING CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Chen v. The City University of New York et al
as 4:2012mc94020
Plaintiff: Ya-Chen Chen
Defendant: The City University of New York , Robert Paaswell , Beth Lesen and others
Chen v. Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1883
Petitioner: JIN XIU CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Chen, et al v. Holder
as 12-1753
Petitioner: XIAO HE CHEN and LING YU LUO
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Wang, et al v. Holder, Jr.
as 12-1708
Petitioner: JIAN MING WANG and YING E. CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
US v. Chen
as 12-1381
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: DONG KAI CHEN
Chen v. Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1925
Petitioner: JIAN LI CHEN
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?