Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Perales v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff Department et al et al
as 1:2017cv11509
Defendant:
Phil Daigneau, Sandra Hutchens, J. Pecot e.g and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CAREY & ASSOCIATES PA et al
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
CAREY & ASSOCIATES PA and GEORGE SHAW
Defendant:
OXFORD COUNTY, OXFORD COUNTY SHERIFF, CUMBERLAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Batavitchene v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 1:2017cv10597
Plaintiff:
Audrone Batavitchene
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , Argie Shapiro , Norfolk County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1590
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sakla, M.D. et al v. Vezina & Gattuso, LLC
as 1:2016cv10533
Plaintiff:
Sheriff K Sakla, M.D. , The Sakla Law Firm and APLC
Defendant:
Vezina & Gattuso, LLC and Boone & Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cox v. Rushie et al
as 1:2013cv11308
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox
Defendant:
Jordan Rushie, Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Roxanne Grinage and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Stefanik v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010mc30029
Petitioner:
Thomas Stefanik
Respondent:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Kevin Burke, Joseph D. McDonald and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beauregard v. Sheriff's Office of Worcester County
as 4:2010cv40143
Plaintiff:
John Beauregard
Defendant:
Sheriff's Office of Worcester County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
