Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Pinto Moniz v. Barr, et al
as 19-1089
Petitioner:
ELTON DJANINI SILVA PINTO MONIZ, a/k/a Elton Djanini Moniz, a/k/a Elton Jaden Moniz, a/k/a Elton D. Moniz, a/k/a Elton Djanini Moniz Pinto
Respondent:
CHRIS M. CRONEN, Director of the Boston, MA ICE Field Office, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Xu v. Barr, et al
as 19-1044
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BROPHY, Assistant Field Office Director, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIQUN XU, a/k/a Dan Xu
De Souza v. Barr, et al
as 19-1028
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO BENTO DE SOUZA
Hussein v. Lyons
as 19-1012
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of Strafford County Department of Corrections
Undetermined:
ABDIGANI FAISAL HUSSEIN, TODD LYONS, Boston Field Office Director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and TODD M. LYONS, Boston Field Office Director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
SEC v. Field
as 17-1698
Plaintiff - Appellee:
US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES C. FIELDS
Defendant:
LOCATEPLUS HOLDINGS CORP. and JON R. LATORELLA
Trustee:
STEPHEN S GRAY
US v. Fields
as 17-1697
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES C. FIELDS
Interested Party:
GEOFFREY CHALMERS, LOCATEPLUS HOLDINGS CORP., LAW OFFICES OF BLAKE J. GODBOUT, d/b/a Blake J. Godbout & Associates and others
Trustee:
CRAIG R. JALBERT, In his capacity as Plan Trustee for the LocatePLUS Plan Trust
Ojo v. Rivera, et al
as 15-8004
Petitioner:
OSAHENRUMWEN OJO
Respondent:
DAVID RIVERA, SIMON A. NADER, Field Office Director, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
