Cases 71 - 80 of 691
Almeida-Leon, et al v. WM Capital Management, Inc.
as 20-2089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO ALMEIDA-LEON, WANDA CRUZ-QUILES and JUAN ALMEIDA-LEON
Interested Party:
GEORGE PEREZ-BORRERO, RAMON GONZALEZ-CORDERO and DORA L. MONSERRATE
Defendant / Appellee:
WM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
TENERIFE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC
US v. Gonzalez-Carro
as 20-1987
Claimant:
OLGA IRIS RIVERA-LA SANTA, LETICIA DIAZ-SANTIAGO, ERASMO COLLAZO-RIVERA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOE CORVETTE GONZALEZ-CARRO, a/k/a Joe Cor
Caraballo-Gonzalez v. US
as 20-1949
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE RAMON CARABALLO-GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lopez-Ramirez, et al v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc., et al
as 20-1937
Defendant:
GRUPO HIMA SAN PABLO, INC., d/b/a Hospital Hima-San Pablo de Caguas, JASON DAVIS, NEXT STEP MEDICAL CO. INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EULALIA LOPEZ-RAMIREZ and LAURA CRISTINA GAUDIER-LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA M. TOLEDO-GONZALEZ and CENTRO MEDICO DEL TURABO INC., d/b/a Hospital Hima-San Pablo de Caguas
Arroyo-Martinez, et al v. Feliciano-Audiffred, et al
as 20-1889
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARILYN ACEVEDO, in her capacity as President of the School Council of the Manuel Mendez Liceaga School, SAMUEL DELGADO, in his capacity as Member of the School Council of the Manuel Mendez Liceaga School, LISA GONZALEZ, in her capacity as Secretary of the School Council of the Manuel Mendez Liceaga School and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YASMIN ACOSTA-ROMAN and NATHANAHEL ARROYO-MARTINEZ
US v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 20-1805
Interested Party:
BEATRIZ VILA-CABASSA, DIANA M. ALCARAZ IRIZARRY, DRA. DIMARIS GARCIA and others
Defendant:
LORENZO GONZALEZ-FELICIANO, Secretary, Department of Health, JOSE DE-LEON, Director, Mental Retardation Program and WANDA VAZQUEZ-GARCED, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent:
ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
US v. Santiago-Lugo
as 20-1776
Interested Party:
ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, PR DEPT OF TREASURY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
