Cases 71 - 80 of 86
In Re: National Organization, et al
as 10-1350
Petitioner:
In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION and NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE
Respondent:
NEAL T. ADAMS, R. CHRISTOPHER ALMY, STEPHANIE ANDERSON and others
Interested Party:
ME CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ELECTIONS
Silva, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 08-2559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. SILVA and WALTER R. SILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and RUTH PELLEGRINI
Bissonnette v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-2495
Petitioner:
ADRIEN WALTER BISSONNETTE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
:
Mesko, et al v. Cabletron Systems, et al
as 1:1997cv00542
Consol Plaintiff:
Philip Adler, Karen Borick, Richard Durr and others
Defendant:
All Defendants, Craig R. Benson, Cabletron Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, BGC Investment Club, BYSG Capital and others
Consol Defendant:
David J. Kirkpatrick, Donald F. McGuinness and Don Reed
Interested Party:
Timothy M. Smith, Sr.
Notice Only:
US District Court - RI, Clerk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Asbestos Litigation, et al v. All Defendants, et al
as 1:1985mc00057
Defendant:
All Defendants, CSR, LTD., Carey Canada, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs
Building Products Corp:
Keene Corporation
Notice Only:
US District Court - EDPA
MySpace, Inc. v. Wallace et al
as 1:2008mc00045
Plaintiff:
MySpace, Inc. and MySpace, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Wallace, Walter Rines, Online Turbo Merchant, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Silva et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv10465
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Silva and Walter R. Silva
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Ruth Pellegrini
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
