Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PRINGLE et al v. FREY et al
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
JANE P PRINGLE, KENNETH FLETCHER, BONNIE S GOULD and others
Defendant:
AARON FREY, MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and MAINE ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1806
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL, GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST, LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY, d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HARDEN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
SUSAN DUDLEY, MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC. and others
Gakuba v. Frey
as 23-1095
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
AARON M. FREY, Attorney General of the State of Maine
Maine Forest Products Council, et al v. Cormier, et al
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAINE FOREST PRODUCTS COUNCIL, PEPIN LUMBER, INC. and STEPHANE AUDET
Defendant / Appellant:
PATTY CORMIER, in her official capacity as Director of the Maine Bureau of Forestry and AARON M. FREY, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maine
McKenzie v. Brannan, et al
as 20-2170
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON M. FREY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Maine and JAMES W. BRANNAN, as personal representative of The Estate of Robert Indiana
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MCKENZIE, individually, and, d/b/a American Image Art and MICHAEL MCKENZIE, individually and d/b/a American Image Art
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
