Cases 1 - 10 of 15
US v. Shea
as 23-1544
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY M. SHEA
Interested Party:
UNION LEADER CORPORATION and MARI-LYNN PURDY
Holloman v. Maine, et al
as 19-1037
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacities, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, JEFFREY P. DAIGNEAULT, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON GILL, Sergeant Corrections Officer, Souza Baranowki Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and FRANK MAINE, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAJUAN HOLLOMAN
US v. Caramadre
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-1125
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CARAMADRE
Interested Party:
ANTHONY M. TRAINI, MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., AXA EQUITABLE and others
US v. Caramadre
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-1196
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CARAMADRE
Interested Party:
ANTHONY M. TRAINI and MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR.
US v. Caramadre
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-1019
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CARAMADRE
Interested Party:
ANTHONY M. TRAINI and MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR.
US v. Caramadre
as 13-1865
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CARAMADRE
Interested Party:
ANTHONY M. TRAINI and MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.