Cases 1 - 10 of 16
US v. Chen
as 22-1352
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
I-HSIN CHEN, a/k/a I-Hsin Joey Chen
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Colburn
as 22-1305
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY COLBURN
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Colburn
as 22-1304
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY COLBURN
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Wilson
as 22-1138
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN WILSON
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Abdelaziz
as 22-1129
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GAMAL ABDELAZIZ
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
Gattineri, et al v. Town of Lynnfield, Masschusetts, et al
as 21-1729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GATTINERI and BOSTON CLEAR WATER COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNNFIELD, MA, PHILIP B. CRAWFORD, Chairman, Lynnfield Board of Selectmen, JAMES M. BOUDREAU, Lynnfield Town Administrator and others
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. CRAWFORD
as 2:2017mc00255
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
ROBERT J CRAWFORD
Walker v. DeSisto et al
as 1:2017cv10738
Defendant:
Duane DeSisto, Patrick Sullivan, Charles Liamos and others
Plaintiff:
Raqim Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States v. Crawford
as 1:2013mc91020
Defendant:
Robert Crawford
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Genovesi v. Nelson et al
as 1:2011cv11932
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Genovesi
Defendant:
Andrew Nelson , Steven Ricciardi , Gannon McAffery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
