Cases 1 - 10 of 691
US v. Perez-Gonzalez
as 24-1454
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSEPH EFRAIN PEREZ-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Peca, a/k/a Stripper
In Re: Santiago-Lugo
as 24-1373
Petitioner:
ISRAEL SANTIAGO-LUGO, a/k/a El Doctor
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC., BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, as claimant of One Urban Lot #72, located at Ibiza St., Paseo Las Brisas, RP. and others
In Re: Gonzalez Diaz
as 24-8009
Respondent:
DALIA STELLA GONZALEZ DIAZ
Interested Party:
PR SUPREME COURT
US v. Gonzalez-Rivera
as 24-1121
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVIN GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Cruz-Vazquez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cruz-Vazquez
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), US Department of Homeland Security, Hon. Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Gonzalez-Seda
as 3:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Atty. Maritza Ortiz and Maritza Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Crisanta Gonzalez-Seda, Raul Lopez-Menendez, Dor Mari Arroyo-Carrero and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Gonzalez
as 23-1707
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
NAPOLEON GONZALEZ, a/k/a Guillermo Gonzalez
Rodriguez-Cotto, et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1626
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ-COTTO and RAFELLI GONZALEZ-COTTO
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Department of Justice, ALEXIS TORRES, Secretary of Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ
Interested Party:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER, INC. and CLINIC FIRST AMENDMENT UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA LAW SCHOOL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
