Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Bonnet, et al v. Whitaker, et al
as 23-2094
Petitioner:
LUIS F. BONNET and CARLOS BENITEZ MALDONADO
Respondent:
MICHAEL GORDON WHITAKER, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, BILLY NOLEN, Acting Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
In Re: Maldonado-Trinidad
as 23-8043
Respondent:
JOSE A. MALDONADO-TRINIDAD
Interested Party:
PR SUPREME COURT
US v. Rodriguez-Maldonado
as 23-1997
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RODRIGUEZ-MALDONADO, a/k/a Michael Rodriguez-Maldonado
US v. Rodriguez-Maldonado
as 23-2003
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RODRIGUEZ-MALDONADO
US v. Maldonado-Negroni
as 23-1768
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER MALDONADO-NEGRONI
Maldonado-Gonzalez, et al v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority, et al
as 23-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN MALDONADO-GONZALEZ, MUNICIPALITY OF MOROVIS, GENOVEVA LOPEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, DORIEL I. PAGAN-CRESPO, in her personal and official capacity Executive Director and JOSE A. RIVERA ORTIZ, in his official capacity as Regional Executive Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Soto-Santini v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 23-1038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANNETTE SOTO-SANTINI
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, DUNCAN R. MALDONADO-EJARQUE and IVAN ALONSO-COSTA
Soto-Santini v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 22-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANNETTE SOTO-SANTINI
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, DUNCAN R. MALDONADO-EJARQUE and IVAN ALONSO-COSTA
US v. Maldonado-Vargas
as 22-1735
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS MALDONADO-VARGAS, a/k/a Carlos Maldonado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
