Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Murray, et al v. McDonald
as 21-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRACE MURRAY, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, AMANDA ENGEN, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, STEPHEN BAUER, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GROCERY DELIVERY E-SERVICES USA INC., d/b/a HelloFresh
Interested Party:
SARAH MCDONALD, KEITH HEAD and KARI HAND BENTON
Murray v. Parnas
as 3:2021cv01470
Plaintiff:
Collin Murray
Defendant:
Noa Parnas
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101
Murray v. State Warden, et al
as 20-1830
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES M. MURRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and STATE WARDEN
Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Services US
as 20-1492
Defendant / Appellant:
GROCERY DELIVERY E-SERVICES USA INC., d/b/a HelloFresh
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRACE MURRAY and GRACE MURRAY, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
In Re: Murray
as 20-1490
Petitioner:
JAMES M. MURRAY
Respondent:
STATE WARDEN and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc.
as 1:2019cv12608
Defendant:
Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. DBA Hello Fresh, Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. and Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. doing business as Hello Fresh
Plaintiff:
Grace Murray, Amanda Engen, Stephen Bauer and others
Not Classified By Court:
Kari Hand Benton, Sarah McDonald and Keith Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mosconas v. Saul
as 19-2049
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL, Region 1 and SCOTT W. MURRAY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY MOSCONAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
NewPro Operating, LLC v. Pic Home Pros, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12068
Defendant:
Murray Perlitch, Gerome Rogers, Ashley Letizia and others
Plaintiff:
NewPro Operating, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Kate Cresswell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
