Cases 1 - 10 of 380
Gousie v. Police and Sheriff's Support Alliance
as 1:2024cv11103
Plaintiff:
Steven E Gousie
Defendant:
Police and Sheriff's Support Alliance
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Soriano
as 23-2090
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN SORIANO, a/k/a Michael Esteven Soriano
Teppler v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
as 1:2023cv12781
Plaintiff:
Steven Teppler
Defendant:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blue Sky Towers III, LLC v. Panebianco
as 1:2023cv12334
Plaintiff:
Blue Sky Towers III, LLC d/b/a BSTMA III, LLC and Blue Sky Towers III, LLC doing business as BSTMA III, LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Panebianco, Richard Neitz, Town of Yarmouth, Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Insulet Corporation v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
Insulet Corporation
Defendant:
EOFlow, Co. Ltd., EOFlow, Inc., Flex, Ltd. and others
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keenholtz v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11522
Plaintiff:
Steven Keenholtz
Defendant:
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. and Point32Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
