Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Gordon v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11558
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Gordon
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geon et al v. Republic of Korea et al
as 1:2013cv13251
Plaintiff:
James Gordon Geon and Chankook Chun
Defendant:
Republic of Korea, Seoul Metropolitan Government and Korea Land & Housing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gravelese et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2013cv13180
Plaintiff:
Gordon Gravelese and Heather Gravelese
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2013cv00423
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 100, Federal National Mortgage Association, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank USA, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Laura S. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Bradshaw, Jr. v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gordon E. Bradshaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , CitiMortgage, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gordon v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Donald Gordon
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and The Bank Of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR BAFC2006-1 v. JAMES
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR BAFC2006-1
Defendant:
GORDON T JAMES
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GORDON T JAMES
Thirdparty_defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE LLC and QUICKEN LOANS INC
Counter_claimant:
GORDON T JAMES
Counter_defendant:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR BAFC2006-1
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
