Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DOHERTY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOHERTY
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Nwagu et al v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv11415
Defendant:
R.N. Katrina Doherty, Katrina Martin, B.S.N., R.N. Luisa Borgonzi and others
Plaintiff:
Stella Nwagu and Paschal Nwagu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doherty v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cera Doherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doherty v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al
as 17-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAYLA DOHERTY
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, UNITED STATES and ME ATTORNEY GENERAL
Doherty et al v. AngioDynamics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv11203
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Susan Doherty and James Doherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOHERTY v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 1:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
KAYLA DOHERTY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DOHERTY v. TERESA MARIE IV INC
as 2:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
AARON DOHERTY
Defendant:
TERESA MARIE IV INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly v. M/V JAMES J. DOHERTY et al
as 1:2009cv11348
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kelly
Defendant:
M/V JAMES J. DOHERTY, Harbor Cruises, LLC and Nolan Associates, LLC d/b/a Boston Harbor Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Doherty et al v. South Shore Medical Center, PC et al
as 1:2007cv12082
Plaintiff:
Jane Doherty and Richard Doherty
Defendant:
South Shore Medical Center, PC, Dennis B. Baily, D.O., Lynda M. Fann, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Doherty v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv11537
Plaintiff:
Owen Doherty
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
