Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CM Services, Inc. v. Cordero-Lebron et al
as 3:2010cv02264
Plaintiff:
CM Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Yesef Cordero-Lebron, Marianita Rosa-Montaez, Miriam Morales-Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Hertz Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv01227
Plaintiff:
Joel Martinez
Defendant:
Hertz Corporation, Puerto Ricancars, Inc., June Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Merced-Morales v. Hernandez-Torres et al
as 3:2009cv02026
Plaintiff:
Orlando Merced-Morales
Defendant:
Gilberto Hernandez-Torres, Felix Rivera, Jhon Isakson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Iqbal-Ara et al v. Arocho-Irizarry et al
as 3:2008cv01487
Plaintiff:
Javid Iqbal-Ara, Eva N. Rosado-Corchado and Kristian Iqbal-Rios
Defendant:
Miguel Arocho-Irizarry, Jose U. Nieves-Soler, Pedro Toledo-Davila and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tavarez-Guerrero et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv02250
Plaintiff:
Lucilo Tavarez-Guerrero, Santos Evelyn Bonilla-Diaz and Conjugal Partnership Tavarez-Bonilla
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jorge Santini-Padilla, Waldo Pabon-Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivas-Ortiz v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2007cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Rivas-Ortiz
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Police Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
