Cases 151 - 160 of 6,421
Moore v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11973
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dwayne Moore
Defendant:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kim v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11956
Petitioner:
Daniel Larry Kim
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv40101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sheehan v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11959
Petitioner:
Daniel Sheehan
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv40102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Duarte v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
United States District Court, Clerk Manager, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahdi v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv11905
Petitioner:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner of Correction, MCI Norfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balcacer v. Divris
as 4:2023cv11843
Petitioner:
Jose Balcacer
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
