Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hernandez v. Commonwealth
as 1:2016cv10953
Petitioner:
Ariel Hernandez
Respondent:
Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Essex County Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13183
Petitioner:
Henry Hernandez
Respondent:
Essex County Correction and Frank Cousin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12737
Plaintiff:
Victor Hernandez
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatis Hernandez et al v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40134
Plaintiff:
Dany Tatis Hernandez and Rogelio Tatis Mercado
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Larry Williams and Officer Burgos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40132
Plaintiff:
Shane Jackson, Patrick Compere, Rogelio Tatis Mercado and others
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Thomas B Duffy, Gerald Montivedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. USA
as 1:2009cv12224
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Fermin Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11733
Plaintiff:
Axel Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Steven J. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez-Reyes v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv10982
Plaintiff:
Simon Hernandez-Reyes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Ashe et al
as 3:2009cv10259
Plaintiff:
Axel Hernandez
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe , John Kenny , Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Ashe et al
as 1:2009cv10259
Plaintiff:
Axel Hernandez
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe, John Kenny, Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
