Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
King v. Veglas et al
as 1:2008cv11191
Plaintiff: Kurt King
Defendant: Beverly Veglas, Peter St. Armand, John Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bargoot v. Marshall et al
as 1:2008cv10726
Plaintiff: Eric R. Bargoot
Defendant: John Marshall, J. Lanpher, Joe Garretson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diaz v. Marshall et al
as 1:2008cv10453
Plaintiff: Johnny Diaz
Defendant: John Marshall, Peter St. Amand, Lampher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cosenza v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2008cv10245
Plaintiff: Natale Cosenza
Defendant: Kathleen M. Dennehy, James Bender, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowlkes v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv12009
Plaintiff: Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant: Kathleen M. Dennehy, James R. Bender, Timothy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrade v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv11078
Plaintiff: Norberto Andrade
Defendant: John Marshall and Keith Germain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nassar v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv10990
Plaintiff: Christopher Nassar
Defendant: Kathleen Dennehy, John Marshall, Kevin O'Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Flynn v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2007cv10965
Plaintiff: Joseph Flynn
Defendant: Massachusetts Department of Correction, James R. Bender, Carol Mici and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houlihan v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv10894
Plaintiff: Brendan Houlihan
Defendant: Kathleen M. Dennehy, Andrea Cabral and John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Marshall
as 1:2007cv10665
Petitioner: Francis Rodriguez
Respondent: John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?